Atlanta, GA (404) 885-1400

Albany, GA (229) 431-3036 

Brunswick, GA (912) 280-9662


  • Home
  • Blog
  • Georgia Supreme Court Rules Apportionment Applies to Strict Products Liability

workers\' compensation, workers compensation, workers comp, water loss claims, trucking litigation, tips, supreme court, sponsorships, spokeo inc, speaking events, slip and fall, seminar, scholarships, robins, retail, recognition, randy moody, quarterly property breakfast series, property claims, product hunt, prima, presentations, paul burke, partnerships, overtime hours, nccae insurance meeting, melody kiella, legal industry, legal, law firms in atlanta, law, kniffen, karen karabinos, juliana neelbauer, journal, john p reale, john feguson, jim anderson, jennifer parrott, jack reale, international association defense counsel, insurance, gold sponsor, georgia prima, georgia legal food frenzy, georgia law injuries, georgia insurance law, football, flsa, firm news, fair labor standard acts, events, estates attorney, estate planning, employment law, employee, elizabeth rose, dri, drew eckl farnham, diversity, def helps, daniel cheek, daniel c kniffen, dan kniffen, dan, cpcu, corporate attorney, corporate, community service, community, client alerts, charity, ce credit, breakfast, blog, best lawyers, awards, attorney speakers, atlanta\'s fastest growing law firms, atlanta business chronicle legal, atlanta business chronicle law firms, atlanta business chronicle, atlanta and tyrannosaurus tech, atlanta, arkansas, april, american bar association, Workers Compensation, Workers Comp, Welch, Volunteer, United Way Coastal of Georgia, US Department of Labor, Speaker, Rose bowl, Robert Welch, Robert L. Welch, Recognition, ROYAL CUP, OFFICE COFFEE, Merrill Lynch, Lisa N. Higgins, Legal Food Frenzy, Karen Karabinos, Juliana was sworn into the Forsyth County Supior Court by Honorable Chief Judge Jeffrey S. Bagley. Juliana is now barred in both Maryland and Georgia, Janeen Smith, Jack Reale, Iowa Hawkeyes, Georgia trusts and estates, Georgia Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, General Liability, GHCC, Firm News, Events, Eric Mull, Drew Eckl and Farnham Summer Associates, Drew Eckl and Farnham Corporate Law, Drew Eckl & Farnham Corporate, Diversity, DRI, DEF Interviews, DEF Achievements, Cyber coverage, Corporate Transaction, Corporate Law, Congratulations to Juliana Neelbauer for passing the Georgia bar! On Friday, Christina Jay, COVID-19, CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS, Business Breakfast Series, Big changes to overtime, Awards, 2016 Summer Associates

Georgia Supreme Court Rules Apportionment Applies to Strict Products Liability

October 20, 2020 BY DEF Admin

On October 19, 2020, the Supreme Court of Georgia issued an Opinion in Johns et al. v. Suzuki Motor Of America, Inc. et al which held that Georgia’s apportionment statute – O.C.G.A.§ 51-12-33(a) – applies to a strict products liability claim under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-11.

In Johns, the plaintiff was seriously injured when the front brake on his Suzuki motorcycle failed suddenly. He later sued the designer and manufacturer of the motorcycle, Suzuki Motor Corporation (SMC) and its wholly-owned subsidiary and American distributor, Suzuki Motor of America Inc. (SMAI), asserting a strict products liability claim based on a design defect, as well as two negligence claims for breach of a continuing duty to warn and negligent recall. The case proceeded to trial and the jury found in favor of Plaintiff on all claims, awarding Plaintiff $10.5 million in compensatory damages. The jury apportioned 49% of the fault to the plaintiff and the remaining 51% to the two defendants (45% to SMC and 6% to SMAI). As a result, the trial court subsequently reduced Plaintiff’s award to $5,355,000.00.

Plaintiff cross-appealed and argued that because their claim was based on strict products liability, the trial court erred in reducing the damages award based on O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33(a). The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling and Plaintiff petitioned for Certiorari with the Supreme Court of Georgia.

The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the trial court and Court of Appeals’ ruling and held that the plain language of the apportionment statute compelled its application to strict products liability cases. In response to Plaintiff’s argument that O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33(a) does not apply because neither that provision nor the preamble to the 2005 act of which it was a part expressly mentions strict products liability, the Court held “it is not necessary for the statute (much less its preamble) to recite “strict products liability” to encompass strict products liability claims like [Plaintiff’s] within its broad, and by all appearances applicable, language.” The Court further declined to create an exception to the apportionment statute for strict products liability claims, as urged by the plaintiff.

This decision represents an important victory for product manufacturers, other businesses, and the defense bar.

For questions regarding this Opinion or Drew Eckl & Farnham’s appellate practice, please contact Elissa Haynes. 

Court Opinion


Elissa Haynes 

(404) 885-6243

[email protected]

Full Bio