Atlanta, GA (404) 885-1400

Albany, GA (229) 431-3036 

Brunswick, GA (912) 280-9662


  • Home
  • Blog
  • Georgia Court of Appeals Affirms Summary Judgment in Double-Fatality Case

workers\' compensation, workers compensation, workers comp, water loss claims, trucking litigation, tips, supreme court, sponsorships, spokeo inc, speaking events, slip and fall, seminar, scholarships, robins, retail, recognition, randy moody, quarterly property breakfast series, property claims, product hunt, prima, presentations, paul burke, partnerships, overtime hours, nccae insurance meeting, melody kiella, legal industry, legal, law firms in atlanta, law, kniffen, karen karabinos, juliana neelbauer, journal, john p reale, john feguson, jim anderson, jennifer parrott, jack reale, international association defense counsel, insurance, gold sponsor, georgia prima, georgia legal food frenzy, georgia law injuries, georgia insurance law, football, flsa, firm news, fair labor standard acts, events, estates attorney, estate planning, employment law, employee, elizabeth rose, dri, drew eckl farnham, diversity, def helps, daniel cheek, daniel c kniffen, dan kniffen, dan, cpcu, corporate attorney, corporate, community service, community, client alerts, charity, ce credit, breakfast, blog, best lawyers, awards, attorney speakers, atlanta\'s fastest growing law firms, atlanta business chronicle legal, atlanta business chronicle law firms, atlanta business chronicle, atlanta and tyrannosaurus tech, atlanta, arkansas, april, american bar association, Workers Compensation, Workers Comp, Welch, Volunteer, United Way Coastal of Georgia, US Department of Labor, Speaker, Rose bowl, Robert Welch, Robert L. Welch, Recognition, ROYAL CUP, OFFICE COFFEE, Merrill Lynch, Lisa N. Higgins, Legal Food Frenzy, Karen Karabinos, Juliana was sworn into the Forsyth County Supior Court by Honorable Chief Judge Jeffrey S. Bagley. Juliana is now barred in both Maryland and Georgia, Janeen Smith, Jack Reale, Iowa Hawkeyes, Georgia trusts and estates, Georgia Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, General Liability, GHCC, Firm News, Events, Eric Mull, Drew Eckl and Farnham Summer Associates, Drew Eckl and Farnham Corporate Law, Drew Eckl & Farnham Corporate, Diversity, DRI, DEF Interviews, DEF Achievements, Cyber coverage, Corporate Transaction, Corporate Law, Congratulations to Juliana Neelbauer for passing the Georgia bar! On Friday, Christina Jay, COVID-19, CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS, Business Breakfast Series, Big changes to overtime, Awards, 2016 Summer Associates

Georgia Court of Appeals Affirms Summary Judgment in Double-Fatality Case

June 13, 2018 BY DEF Admin

Andrew Horowitz recently received a favorable ruling from the Georgia Court of Appeals on behalf of a guardrail-installation contractor in a case stemming from a horrific highway accident on Interstate 75 in which two motorists were killed.  The accident occurred when the motorists’ vehicle was pushed off the highway into the median area, where it struck a concrete pier, killing the motorists instantly.  Their daughter and estate subsequently sued the guardrail contractor, which had recently installed a stretch of guardrail alongside the concrete pier, alleging that the installation violated applicable regulations as it was too short.

In affirming summary judgment to the guardrail contractor, the Court of Appeals held that Georgia’s acceptance doctrine insulated the contractor against tort liability stemming from its previous work.  That doctrine generally provides that contractors have no tort liability for accidents, claims, or damages that occur after the owner accepts their completed work.  Here, the accident occurred nearly 10 months after the Georgia Department of Transportation accepted the guardrail work and reclaimed control over the project area.  Consequently, the Court of Appeals determined that the guardrail contractor was not responsible for the accident, even if the guardrail were in fact too short.  The Court of Appeals appeared to have been further persuaded by the undisputed evidence that the contractor played no role in the project’s design.

The case had spanned nearly 5 years, involved roughly 20 depositions, and included an unsuccessful mediation in which Plaintiff demanded a 7-figure settlement.


Mr. Horowitz focuses his practice in civil tort litigation and represents individuals, corporations and insurance companies in state and federal courts. His practice includes an emphasis on general tort and insurance litigation, construction, and products liability law.

Full Bio