Drew Eckl & Farnham Expands Georgia Presence with Addition of Albany Office
March 01, 2019 BY DEF Admin | Firm News
"Drew Eckl & Farnham is pleased to announce the expansion of their Georgia presence with the addition of two partners and an office in Albany, GA. Fred Lee and Dave Orlowski, formerly partners in Lee Orlowski, will be joining the firm as partners as of March 1." ... Continue Reading
U.S. Supreme Court Deemed The Use of Attorney General Letterhead is Not Misleading When Used by Private Attorneys in Special Counsel
May 17, 2016 BY Eric Retter | Client Alerts
Collection Letters Mailed by Private Attorneys Serving as Special Counsel to State Attorney General Not False or Misleading When On Attorney General Letterhead ... Continue Reading
Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins: Light at the End of the Tunnel
May 17, 2016 BY Adam Beedenbender | Client Alerts
In a May 16, 2016 opinion, the United States Supreme Court issued a holding which could offer debt collectors substantial protection against frivolous consumer suits and class actions in the federal courts. ... Continue Reading
Third Party Medical Case Management in Non-Catastrophic Claims: Board Rule 200.2
February 09, 2016 BY DEF Admin | Client Alerts
The State Board of Worker' Compensation recently promulgated a new Board Rule, which took effect January 1, 2016. Board Rule 200.2 provides some guidelines for the widely-used practice of medical case management by third party vendors in non-catastrophic claims. Employers and Insurers have long utilized third party medical case managers in order to maintain control over a claimant's medical treatment and to facilitate medical care with an eye on the claimant's return to work and resolution of the claim. ... Continue Reading
Georgia Supreme Court: The Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity Does Not Bar Sureties and Subrogees from Recovering Against the State
June 01, 2015 BY Adam Beedenbender | Client Alerts
On September 22, 2014, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed a controversial Court of Appeals decision, which held that the doctrine of sovereign immunity did not bar sureties or subrogees from recovering breach of contract damages from the State, so long as the surety or subrogee's principal would have a cause of action for such damages. ... Continue Reading